I'm worried that your plot summaries are just rewordings — and not actual rewrites — of stolen plots. Revenge of the Lawn Gnomes and some of the other summaries you've done still seem to follow the same structure as the original summary.
I'm not sure we can say that these are "original" — if they were influenced by something else.
How so? I feel I've kept my summaries as different as possible. I've added details that aren't in the stolen plots, and I've followed the stories in the correct order of events, as opposed to many of BB's summaries which have events completely out of order. You can remove the lawn gnomes summary if you want, but I don't personally feel it's a rewrite at all.
Sorry, I hope I didn't come across as rude. I did look over BB's summary a bit, but all words are my own and I tried to keep it as different as possible. I looked over my summary, and there definitely are some similarities, so I understand your suspicion. I altered a few sentences to get rid of those, so hopefully it's better and more original sounding now. If you want if altered further, or removed, I don't mind.
I guess that's your call. I would never pass off his work as my own, and I've always tried to avoid making my summaries sound like rewordings, I'm sorry if this, or any other I've written comes off as that, but it was never intentional. I can see the similarities you're talking about, but I really don't think my summaries sound anything like his.