Thread:GoosebumpsArt/@comment-4207976-20180115030503/@comment-4207976-20180115033218

>That seems pretty frivilous in my opinion. Not only that, it'd also be really difficult to do thoroughy. I don't see the ends justifying the means.

It's already mentioned on some pages though (i.e. "Tear-outs" section).

>In some cases, they are. Like the Retro-Tins.

Hmm... I might consider the retro tins to be hybrids of reprint collections and boxed collections. Though, I'm leaning towards the former. The covers, while using the original series template, are different. The logo is no longer raised, the Scholastic logo placement is different, the pages look different, and books themselves feel different. So I would probably classify them under "reprint collections".