Thread:Dimensionshark/@comment-35973360-20180909032758/@comment-28171460-20180909034024


 * >Books with sequels

Not a bad idea. Maybe.


 * >Books without sequels

I don't know about that one. With the exception of the "Books" category, it would be weird having a category that encompass a majority of all books.


 * >And, considering that we have a category for books that did not recieve a television adaption, shouldn't we have one for those that did?

Not every category needs an inverse category.