Thread:GoosebumpsArt/@comment-4207976-20180115030503/@comment-28171460-20180115031959


 * >It's the same as the original print, but may feature new watermarks on the cover (i.e. "Spooky 1994 calendar inside!), or include bonuses, such as tear-outs.

That seems pretty frivilous in my opinion. Not only that, it'd also be really difficult to do thoroughy. I don't see the ends justifying the means.


 * >I'm not sure if boxed collections should be mentioned on pages.

In some cases, they are. Like the Retro-Tins. If you don't want to call them reprints, that's fine, but they belong on the page somewhere.


 * >should the "Tear-outs" section come before or after "Artwork"?

I'm not entirely sure.