Thread:GodzillaFan1/@comment-28171460-20170415212741/@comment-28171460-20170415224540

Prepare for an editors manifesto...

>triv·i·a: details, considerations, or pieces of information of little importance or value.

And how exactly would you quantify importance? The trivia section usually receives the most user interaction of any area of the page. I can guarantee you that more users care about the trivia than a chronological list of reprints and reissues. The very detailed and specific niche information is great for someone who is researching the book, but trivial (see what I did there) to 90% of readers. What do readers think is important?

Additionally, think about it this way. Logically, what should follow the story? More info directly about the story. Why follow a synopsis information about merchandise, reprints, and references?

When you look at the navigation, it looks fine, but scroll down the page. It looks messy. Adding more and more sections and sub sections is kinda' the problem.

Logic should always outweigh uniformity with Wikipedia.