Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-34202220-20180805022658/@comment-28171460-20180806040748


 * >users who do not feel 100% confident with their grammar and/or English skills and suspect there may be issues. I really don't think you'd get an influx of terrible pages.

I do want to help individuals such as this, but I don't know if a category is the best way. It seems like rewrite boxes — perhaps even forums posts — could suffice.


 * >The grammar issues exist even with the current rules in place.

The categories "Pages needing attention" and "Candidates for deletion" are essentially backlogs. They help us deal with weak articles that already exist. "Pages needing attention" is a lengthy category, but it isn't growing.


 * >I really think a defined category for grammar would help fix the issues quickly.

Sadly, the quickest path to fixing all the bad articles is by editing, not categorizing. We have a lot of categories, but not a lot of editors.


 * >but is there really that many pages with bad grammar...?

I'd be willing to bet that 90% of the pages on this wiki could use some amount of reworking.