User blog comment:Monster Blood Drive/ Return of *Insert Villain of Interest*/@comment-25506374-20171015065741/@comment-33210834-20171015130518

>So in a way, Rachel would inadvertently reveal that Jackson was innocent all along and make everyone think that she is a witch who caused her brother to do those horrible things earlier, knowing their relationship. And then Jackson's name is cleared.

Daughter of Slappy wouldn't really work if it didn't have Slappy either. Rachel was only utilized for the twist ending and most of what happened to Jackson was all Slappy. What would be the point continuing his story if he's not involved whatsoever? I also feel that the whole plot and ending would just undo what Son of Slappy did well and was probably a first for Slappy: ''he actually won. ''He wasn't put back to sleep, he wasn't destroyed or had his mind stolen, or beaten up by other living dolls and dummies. He actually won, and succedded in ruining our protagonist's life. He will never be seen the same again. Jackson has developed evil outbursts whenever he hears chirping, no one would believe him if he tried to explain it was Slappy's fault (especially since the dummy was mistaken for a harmless duplicate of the real deal, thus more skeptcism for any claims), and lets not forget the ambigious ending where Slappy punished him for eavesdropping. I feel all those rammifications toward Jackson's life was what made that book great and actually scary. Sometimes it's best to leave these stories where they end as not to tarnish what they worked so hard to do for the reader.