Thread:Dimensionshark/@comment-35973360-20180909032758/@comment-35973360-20180909034843

>With the exception of the "Books" category, it would be weird having a category that encompass a majority of all books.

I see your point. Probably not necessary. I still think that books with sequels would be a good category to have.

>Not every category needs an inverse category.

Fair enough. It would be quite a large group.

Thanks, and as promised, 👍